Re: odd name-rev behavior?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 16, 2011, 05:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr518sjyq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20111116014842.GF27706@comcast.net>
Tim Walberg <twalberg@comcast.net> writes:
> That does indeed seem to work on first try. Not sure it was > a particularly critical issue - just unexpected.
I didn't think it is particularly critical, either, and that is why I said it has been like this for eons at least since v1.6.0.
And it turns out that this was pretty much from day one of name-rev at bd321bc (Add git-name-rev, 2005-10-26).