Re: Composing git repositories
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 2, 2013, 19:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr4isda1u.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130402185426.GG28148@google.com>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 20 quoted lines
> ..., but it might make sense to start respecting a .motd file to allow > the following in a hypothetical world where everyone who clones git > uses the same scripts Junio does: > > $ git clone git://repo.or.cz/git.git > Cloning into 'git'... > remote: Counting objects: 151283, done. > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (38546/38546), done. > remote: Total 151283 (delta 111004), reused 151073 (delta 110797) > Receiving objects: 100% (151283/151283), 36.39 MiB | 7.66 MiB/s, done. > Resolving deltas: 100% (111004/111004), done. > > Don't forget to "git clone -b todo git://repo.or.cz/git.git git/Meta" > for maintenance scripts. > $ > > That would allow you to include an arbitrary setup script (including > cloning dependencies as well as running "autoreconf" or whatever) and > give people cloning a quick reminder to inspect it if paranoid and > then run it.
I do not think motd is a good fit for the above; the message will disappear any time once you are done cloning. Depending on how common the use of Meta/ should be, it is more appropriate to have such an instruction in README or some other places as tracked contents.
I do not know if the above is related to the problem Ram is trying to solve or a totally orthogonal issue, though.