Re: GIT 1.4.3-rc2
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Oct 10, 2006, 17:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vpsd02hkm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061010093914.GC8612@admingilde.org>
Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org> writes:
> have you looked into the git-fetch --update-head-ok thing I sent last > week?
I remember seeing it and wondering what workflow would need it. Also at the same time I wondered if it was indeed needed for a workflow why that workflow can get away with adding only that option to git-fetch without either adding more things to it or have a custom porcelain that drives the underlying git-fetch-pack directly.
In the end I dropped it on the floor because what I wondered about was not clear from the proposed commit log message.