Re: Instructions concerning detached head lead to lost local changes
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Feb 2, 2007, 07:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vps8thulj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702020206480.3021@xanadu.home>
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> It's just that moving around amongst thousands of commits to pin point a > particular commit might require some digging work. This is why there > might be some value in a particular position and why there is an attempt > at protecting that "work". > > But since moving to another position while still remaining detached from > any branch has the same potential for losing the important position and > so without any kind of protection then it makes no sense to have such a > protection when moving back to a branch.
Thanks -- I'd agree.
Also I agree that "reflog on HEAD" is the right direction as it makes these 'protection' unnecessary. I've applied all your patches from today on the topic, along with Johannes's "log -g @{now}".