Re: [PATCH 1/4] add mode parameter to get_sha1
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Apr 21, 2007, 18:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vps5xtvqw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1177158380197-git-send-email-mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
> If the mode parameter is not NULL, get_sha1 will store > the mode of the object in it.
Most existing callers pass NULL to this. Wouldn't it be cleaner to have a new get_sha1_with_mode() function, and convert the callers that care about mode to use it, like this?
int get_sha1(const char *str, unsigned char sha1[20]) {
unsigned discard;
return get_sha1_with_mode(str, sha1, &discard);
}That way, your patch would be much easier to review and would have less chance of getting it wrong. I wonder if [2/4] can be made less impact using a similar trick. Most of the existing callers that place objects in object_array do not know the mode. Only some do.
+/* unknown mode */ +#define S_IFINVALID 0320000 +
This hunk does not belong to [1/4]; it is part of [2/4].
Typically S_IF$TYPE macros are masked with S_IFMT (0170000) before being used, so the above value is *obviously* invalid, but it also risks our code would treat it as a symlink, we do the masking before comparison. I wonder if defining it to S_IFMT mask itself might be a safer option.