Re: [PATCH/RFC] make the new block-sha1 the default
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:04:37PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
>> ... and remove support for linking against the openssl SHA1 code.
>>
>> The block-sha1 implementation is not significantly worse and sometimes
>> even faster than the openssl SHA1 implementation. This allows for
>
> Is there a reason not to leave the option of linking against openssl?
I think it is a valid question. Why remove the _option_?
I would certainly understand it if you made BLK_SHA1 the _default_, though.