Re: `git mv` has ambiguous error message for non-existing target
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 17, 2012, 19:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vpq3cja4y.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <50A5E6D2.5060609@gmx.de>
Patrick Lehner <lehner.patrick@gmx.de> writes:
> But just because mv's error essage isnt very good, does that mean git > mv's error message mustn't be better?
Did I say the error message from 'mv' was not very good in the message you are responding to (by the way, this is why you should never top-post when you are responding to a message on this list)?
I meant to say that the message from 'mv' is good enough, so is the one given by 'git mv'.
I wouldn't reject a patch that updates our message to something more informative without looking at it, though.