Re: Random thoughts on "upstream"

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: May 23, 2013, 17:25 UTC
Message-ID: <7vppwhfw20.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0m1x_qrJfQ2Xw3w_kVuM-JHERFukbfxHyR08ODvxysKzw@mail.gmail.com>

Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:

Show 12 quoted lines

> [remote "theodore"]
>     push = master
>     push = +pu
>
> This means that I will always push master without force and pu with
> force, irrespective of the branch I'm on.
>
> [remote "origin"]
>     push = refs/heads/*:refs/heads/rr/*
>
> This means that I will always push all branches without force with
> rewriting, irrespective of the branch I'm on.

Exactly. And some people are unhappy about it, because they prefer to work per-branch basis, as opposed to having to perfect everything into a publishable state first and then finally push everything out in one go.

I am not saying default=single would be _the_ single right way to solve it, but "when you have default=single, remote.$name.push is used only to describe the mapping, not forcing you to push everything out at once" is one possible solution to that.