Re: git tag usability issue: Lightweight vs Annotated confusion for the end user (ex. git describe default)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 24, 2013, 20:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vppu766ev.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <032D5084-C70F-4F62-8F62-975ADEA56ED6@JonathonMah.com>
Jonathon Mah <me@JonathonMah.com> writes:
> I always add --tags when I call git-describe. Is there any reason this shouldn't become the new default (quickly, before git 2.0 perhaps)?
The distinction is there for a reason--- annotated tags are meant for the more "public" and "permanent" stuff, while you can do lightweight tags for random short-term stuff.
An argument could be to change Git not to follow unannotated tags with "git fetch" and "git push --follow-tags" by default, which goes in the direction to make the distinction even clear. But for a change to make the distinction less useful, I would have to say it is probably a bad idea.