Re: Change set based shallow clone
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Sep 12, 2006, 00:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vodtmey30.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <ee4tmo$mhm$1@sea.gmane.org>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
> Actually 'git ls-remote .' _is_ useful for gitweb, see the new > git_get_references code.
You are missing the point.
We are not discussing if having foo^{} is useful. There is no argument about it. Without it the user is forced to ask rev-parse.
The point is if it is Ok to assume foo and foo^{} (and nothing else) are enough to make Porcelains and visualizers happy, and I suspected the answer was no (remember show-ref discussion?).