Re: [RFC 09/13] new_branch(): verify that new branch name is a valid full refname
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 19, 2011, 21:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vobxcbqeu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1319057716-28094-10-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
mhagger@alum.mit.edu writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> > --- > > Is it possible to omit the REFNAME_ALLOW_ONELEVEL option from this > call?
I _think_ it takes an unadorned branch name, so the most prudent would be to check the result of prefixing "refs/heads/" to *name with REFNAME_FULL.
Show 16 quoted lines
> fast-import.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fast-import.c b/fast-import.c
> index 8d8ea3c..51cf898 100644
> --- a/fast-import.c
> +++ b/fast-import.c
> @@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ static struct branch *new_branch(const char *name)
>
> if (b)
> die("Invalid attempt to create duplicate branch: %s", name);
> - if (check_refname_format(name, REFNAME_ALLOW_ONELEVEL))
> + if (check_refname_format(name, REFNAME_FULL|REFNAME_ALLOW_ONELEVEL))
> die("Branch name doesn't conform to GIT standards: %s", name);
>
> b = pool_calloc(1, sizeof(struct branch));