Re: FW: question about merge in 1.7.10
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 24, 2012, 20:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vobsoypb3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1F026B57884A5841B330471696849DE9114503D7@MBX021-W4-CA-5.exch021.domain.local>
Marlene Cote <Marlene_Cote@affirmednetworks.com> writes:
> I used merge with -no-commit -no-ff. So, I assume I won't see any > change in behavior, since merge is not performing commits, right?
The _only_ difference is when
(1) "git merge" is run interactively;
(2) the merge goes cleanly that it does not need to ask help from the
user to resolve conflicts; and
(3) it records the result by creating a commit.Because your use case with "--no-commit" does not satisfy the last criteria, I do not expect you to see any difference. Otherwise you may have found a bug.
As noted in
http://git-blame.blogspot.com/2012/02/anticipating-git-1710.html
please try out the version from the 'master' branch before it gets released, so that you can help us avoid surprises in the corner cases.
Thanks.