Re: Edit a rerere conflict resolution
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 16, 2012, 16:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vobrwh4zc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vvcm4h61a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org> writes: > >> No, I turned rerere.autoupdate off. Proven in the above by the line >> "Resolved... " instead of "Staged...". > > Yeah, actually I just tried and the procedure works with or without > autoupdate for me. > > So there is something different between our setup (or the nature of the > conflict), but I do not know what it is offhand.
The last message from me on this topic for now as I'll be a bit too busy, but a wild guess/hunch: grep NEEDSWORK near rerere.c::handle_cache()?
I suspect that we might need to also update this function to handle "both sides added, but differently" case, as we do so in check_one_conflict() these days, but for Vincent's particular case that shouldn't be the cause.