Re: [CORRECTED PATCH] git-fetch-pack: avoid unnecessary zero packing
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Oct 18, 2005, 18:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vmzl6r78e.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510181049050.17201@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Ok, this should be the trivially fixed (famous last words) patch, which > should correct the case where we don't have a local name for the remote > ref at all. > > If you already applied the previous patch, you just need to fix the
No, I haven't (not my git day today).
It strikes me that we could walk from our refs, depth reasonably limited to say 20 or so commit chain and/or last 5 days of commit time, to see if any of the remotes are reachable from our refs and omit issuing "want" quite cheaply. Do you think that would be a worthy change to make things more efficient?