Re: About -X<option>
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 6, 2008, 04:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vmykvpq2n.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807060342550.3557@eeepc-johanness>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> Isn't that obvious? -X looks like a short option, but the rest of that > string does not consist of aggregated short options.
Ah, I see. Then the issue is not about "not easy to code" but about "not being consistent". We should care much more deeply about the latter.
We can change it to "--X<option>[=<value>]" and "-X option[=<value>]"; the topic is still young, not even documented properly IIRC, and is not scheduled for 'master' any time soon yet.