Re: Handling large files with GIT
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Feb 16, 2006, 03:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vlkwckml7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602151915010.916@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
> Junio, that "traverse_trees()" logic is totally independent of whether we > actually do "git-merge-tree" or not, so if you want to, I could split up > the patches the other way (and merge "traverse_trees()" first as a new > interface, independently).
I won't have time to look at the actual patch tonight but I am interested. I think the general idea should work nice with both multi-base and octopus merge cases as well ;-).