Re: [PATCH 1/6] gitopt: a new command-line option parser for git
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- May 9, 2006, 20:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vlktb2ayy.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060509231031.b62576da.tihirvon@gmail.com>
Timo Hirvonen <tihirvon@gmail.com> writes:
> I think optional arguments are still confusing. We could support both > -C (no args) and -C=20 syntax.
Actually, optional numeric arguments are the norm not exception. Think of "diff -u" vs "diff -u20" for example. Also I think it is conventional not to use = for single-letter single-dash options, so -C (no args -- use the default number of the implementation whatever it is) and -C20 (the same behaviour in principle as -C, but use my number instead of the default) are sane, while -C=20 _is_ odd.
Having said that, I think abbreviating -u20 -n -r to -u20nr going too far (-nru20 would be palatable perhaps), even if the implementation allows such, unless you are entering "obfusucated command line parameters" contest.