Re: Darcs
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 24, 2007, 22:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vlke9ouv8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <46a038f90706241345m4b5ecb80p9f4ec840993023e0@mail.gmail.com>
"Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> "Academic". > > OTOH, and from the POV of someone closely following the SCM tools in > the last few years (and using almost all of them), darcs was the first > usable DSCM in the camp. I am not sure how much of its commandline > user interface was borrowed from BK or elsewhere, but darcs was > _easy_, where Arch was extremely hard to use.
I second this. Before I started contributing to git in its early weeks, I staged my own changes to my day-job project in darcs to trickle them in to the company's central repository (I was sufficiently faster than other members of the project and I had to pace myself).
It would have been much more difficult for me to grasp the basic concepts of how "distributed development" process works, if I did not have an exposure to Darcs before I started, especially because I never used BK.