Re: RFC: Flat directory for notes, or fan-out? Both!
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 10, 2009, 22:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vljsdly7f.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <200902102316.56348.trast@student.ethz.ch>
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> Or we could use an on-disk hashmap. Oh, wait... > > While reading this thread, I sure wondered ... why don't we use the > one on-disk fast access structure we already have: the index?
Since when the index has become a on-disk fast access structure?
> Sure, one problem is that the index reading code is inherently written > for a single index state.
That's wrong, but because the index is not a on-disk fast access structure to begin with, the incorrect statement about it is excused ;-)