git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [RFC 4/6] git-check-attr: Normalize paths

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Aug 4, 2011, 17:05 UTC
Message-ID
<7vliv95cpb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To
<4E3A12B9.1010800@alum.mit.edu>
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
Show 23 quoted lines
>> I think passing down "prefix" (i.e. where your $(cwd) was relative to the
>> root level of the working tree) and the user-supplied "pathspec" (which
>> typically is relative to that original $(cwd)) is the canonical approach.
>> The very original git worked only at the root level of the working tree,
>> with paths specified relative to the root level of the tree, so many code
>> do:
>> 
>> 	- find out the root of the working tree;
>>         - note where the $(cwd) was in "prefix";
>>         - chdir to the root of the working tree;
>> 	- prepend the "prefix" to user supplied pathspec;
>>         - forget all the complexity and work on the whole tree.
>> 
>> Then the "prefix" gets stripped away from the beginning of the paths when
>> reporting.
>> 
>> Your patch from a cursory look seems to follow that pattern, which is
>> good.
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> Yes, my code follows the pattern, except that in this case it is
> unnecessary to chdir to the root of the working tree.

Just to make sure there is no misunderstanding. The chdir() should not be in the core part of the system that you may want to libify.

The above pattern was developed primarily so that older utility functions in the system that were written back when nobody ran git from anywhere other than the top level of the working tree can be easily adapted to main programs that can be launched from a subdirectory. The initial set-up part of the program is responsible for figuring out "prefix", turning relative paths given by the user into paths relative to the top of the working tree, and then chdir'ing to the top.

After all that happens, the library-ish parts of the system only have to deal with full paths relative to the root of the working tree. "prefix" comes into play when reporting the results (i.e. showing paths relative to user's $(cwd) in the output or in the error messages).

Previous: Michael HaggertyNext: Michael Haggerty
Message 8 of 15 in “[RFC 0/6] git-check-attr should work for relative paths”
  1. Michael HaggertyJul 28, 2011
  2. 1/6 git-check-attr: test that no output is written to stderrMichael Haggerty, Jul 28, 2011
  3. 2/6 git-check-attr: Demonstrate problems with unnormalized pathsMichael Haggerty, Jul 28, 2011
  4. 3/6 git-check-attr: Demonstrate problems with relative pathsMichael Haggerty, Jul 28, 2011
  5. 4/6 git-check-attr: Normalize pathsMichael Haggerty, Jul 28, 2011
  6. Junio C HamanoAug 2, 2011
  7. Michael HaggertyAug 4, 2011
  8. Junio C HamanoAug 4, 2011
  9. Michael HaggertyAug 5, 2011
  10. Junio C HamanoAug 5, 2011
  11. Michael HaggertyAug 7, 2011
  12. 5/6 test-path-utils: Add subcommand "absolute_path"Michael Haggerty, Jul 28, 2011
  13. 6/6 test-path-utils: Add subcommand "prefix_path"Michael Haggerty, Jul 28, 2011
  14. Junio C HamanoAug 2, 2011
  15. Michael HaggertyAug 4, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.