Re: Out of memory error with git rebase
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 31, 2011, 20:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vlis0q5d6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <83r51ta1rq.fsf@kalahari.s2.org>
Hannu Koivisto <azure@iki.fi> writes:
> From the documentation I can't figure out any reason why one > wouldn't always want to use -m. Why is it not the default? I > think it's pretty much impossible for ordinary users to figure out > that they need -m in a situation like this.
Because most people do not have too large binary blobs in the history, and at least when "rebase" was originally written, merge-based rebasing was way slower than patch-based one.