Re: linux-next: unneeded merge in the security tree
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 12, 2013, 22:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vli9s5ldz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CA+55aFzWjfFjcRZXBO+edO7f66REA0pOsC3iZ2vYdHrkcovnHA@mail.gmail.com>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> That said, adding the signature from an upstream tag doesn't really > seem to be hugely useful. I'm not seeing much of an upside, in other > words. I'd *expect* that people would pick up upstream tags > regardless, no?
Yes, their "git fetch" will auto-follow, but mergetag embedded in the commit objects will give the history auditable trail the same way as the merges you make your downstream. You of course could match out-of-line tags against back-merges and verify your merges with mergetags, but you do not have to.