Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] Towards a more awesome git branch
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 10, 2013, 16:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vli6ij6nw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0kY1P_rLF45L37swzgLhgT7nxmcGpJGjAAhbQheA8pN7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> [-CC: Duy, since he has left the community] > > Junio: since Duy is no longer around to guide us, I will rely on your guidance. > > Duy Nguyen wrote: >> I'm starting to think this is a half-baked solution. It hides >> problems, for example commit placeholders should produce empty string, >> not the literal placeholders. > > Why should they produce empty strings? Aren't they equivalent to > invalid placeholders?
I haven't even skimmed the series, so responding to a comment given as a response to 00/15 is a bit difficult, but I _think_ this refers to this issue: what should "%(cD)" produce when given to for-each-ref and you have a tag that points at non committish?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/226343/focus=226460
I may be guessing incorrectly what Duy's comment is about, though.
I'll hopefully have something more concrete and useful after I have a chance to read the series, but not now.