Re: [PATCH 1/3] list-objects: add "void *data" parameter to show functions
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 8, 2009, 02:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vk55vubcv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090407040854.4338.94304.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes:
> The goal of this patch is to get rid of the "static struct rev_info > revs" static variable in "builtin-rev-list.c".
Hmm. If it were a more library-ish file, a removal of such a static variable might help you to make more than one calls to a library function, but does it matter in files like builtin-rev-list.c? Its cmd_rev_list() is like main() --- it is meant to run once and exit.
So if it is the only goal of this series, I am inclined to say that I do not have a reason to look at the rest of the series, but as a side effect does this removal make some other API better? Perhaps a more library-ish function is in builtin-rev-list.c and this structure should really needs to be passed around as a parameter, but I cannot tell solely by reading the goal above, without reading the patches themselves.
> Anyway this makes the code more clean and more generic, so it > should be a good thing in the long run.
I wouldn't disagree with that "long run" thing, but the answer to the above question affects the placement of this series in my prioritized queue.