Re: [RFC] Add --create-cache to repack
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2011, 08:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vk4hmbyuo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTimuW-7D4YA2jeF+y4DPE=CdqtL713MQK+1Gtp-d@mail.gmail.com>
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
> Using this for object enumeration shaves almost 1 minute off server > packing time; the clone dropped from 3m28s to 2m29s. That is close to > what I was getting with the cached pack idea, but the network transfer > stayed the small 376 MiB.
I like this result.
The amount of transfer being that small was something I didn't quite expect, though. Doesn't it indicate that our pathname based object clustering heuristics is not as effective as we hoped?