git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: git branch -M" regression in 1.7.7?

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Nov 28, 2011, 19:38 UTC
Message-ID
<7vk46kuje6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To
<20111126023002.GA17652@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> 	git branch -M master
>
> This seems like a valuable exception to allow, because then "git
> branch -M foo" would _always_ be allowed --- either 'foo' is not the
> current branch, and it does the obvious thing, or 'foo' is the current
> branch, and nothing happens.
>
> Buildbot uses this idiom and was broken in 1.7.7 (it would emit the
> message "Cannot force update the current branch").

Although I am not sure the practice deserves to be called "idiom", I agree that there is no reason to forbid renaming the current branch to the tip commit of itself.

Will queue.
Previous: Andreas Schwab
Message 9 of 9 in “git branch -M" regression in 1.7.7?”
  1. ☂Josh Chia (谢任中)Nov 26, 2011
  2. Jonathan NiederNov 26, 2011
  3. Test renaming a branch to itselfConrad Irwin, Nov 26, 2011
  4. Jonathan NiederNov 26, 2011
  5. Conrad IrwinNov 26, 2011
  6. Jonathan NiederNov 26, 2011
  7. Junio C HamanoNov 26, 2011
  8. Andreas SchwabNov 26, 2011
  9. Junio C HamanoNov 28, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.