Re: [PATCH] cvs-migration documentation update

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Jan 31, 2006, 03:18 UTC
Message-ID: <7virs13x1i.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060129043147.GA9581@fieldses.org>

"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes:

> Here's some changes to the cvs-migration.txt.  As usual, in my attempt
> to make things clearer someone may have found I've made them less so, or
> I may have just gotten something wrong; so any review is welcomed.

Again, thanks for doing this.

> I moved the material describing shared repository management from
> core-tutorial.txt to cvs-migration.txt, where it seems more appropriate,
> and combined two sections to eliminate some redundancy.

Seems sensible.

Show 16 quoted lines

> diff --git a/Documentation/cvs-migration.txt...
> index 8fd1a33..2bd58d3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/cvs-migration.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/cvs-migration.txt
> @@ -1,126 +1,182 @@
>  git for CVS users
>  =================
>  
> -..., and the
> -first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem. The fact that
> -you are reading this file means that you may be well on that path
> -already.
> -
> -The thing about CVS is that it absolutely sucks...
> -
> -One particular suckage of CVS is very hard to work around: CVS is...

Somehow I miss the above two paragraphs and a half ;-). But listing the differences as bullet points as you did makes things much clearer. I like it.

Show 5 quoted lines

> +------------------------------------------------
> +$ git push origin master
> +------------------------------------------------
> +
> +If some else has updated the repository more recently, `git push`, like

some else?