git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Should "pull --rebase" try to be a little cleverer?

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Jan 21, 2008, 18:21 UTC
Message-ID
<7vir1nxcoh.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To
<alpine.LSU.1.00.0801211542150.5731@racer.site>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> However, if we already have refs/remotes/blabla/master, we could DWIM the 
> --rebase call to
>
> 	git rebase --onto FETCH_HEAD refs/remotes/blabla/master
FWIW, I like it, and I think that is what users expect it to do.
Previous: Nicolas PitreNext: Johannes Schindelin
Message 5 of 8 in “Should "pull --rebase" try to be a little cleverer?”
  1. Johannes SchindelinJan 21, 2008
  2. Nicolas PitreJan 21, 2008
  3. Johannes SchindelinJan 21, 2008
  4. Nicolas PitreJan 21, 2008
  5. Junio C HamanoJan 21, 2008
  6. pull --rebase: be cleverer with rebased upstream branchesJohannes Schindelin, Jan 26, 2008
  7. Junio C HamanoJan 26, 2008
  8. Johannes SchindelinJan 26, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.