Re: git bugs
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 11, 2008, 21:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7viqwfbpzs.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806111151260.3101@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Ben Lynn wrote: >> >> The only drawback is that I'm not sure how acceptable it is to write to >> the index on a read operation. Is this a big deal? > > Historically, we *never* did it. In fact, it was a big deal. These days we > do it opportunistically for "git diff" if we can, but making sure that it > all still works for a read-only access (think gitweb etc - the reader is
Thanks for giving a good summary (I've been away), and I agree with your analysis of the situation. I do not see much need to _fix_ anything around this area, except your "smudging is not zero timestamp" update.