Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Narrow/Sparse checkout round 3:
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 19, 2008, 09:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7viqtxcr1i.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <loom.20080817T094637-285@post.gmane.org>
Eric Raible <raible@gmail.com> writes:
> s/but we would need to have/but we may need/ > in the commit message?
Yeah, strictly speaking, perhaps.
One thing that I refuse to believe is we will need only one more bit and after assigning the 0x4000 bit to whatever that single purpose the index will stay that way forever. So we would need to reserve that bit as the extension bit in any case. If we do not have any extension forever, that means any index entry with the bit set is corrupt, so erroring out would be the right thing to do anyway ;-).