Re: [PATCH] 3% tighter packs for free
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Mar 18, 2006, 19:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vhd5vwo7e.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603181315060.4889@localhost.localdomain>
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:
> Tried that long ago. As BLK_SIZE is increased the adler32 cost, which > has to be computed for every offset in the target buffer, increases > accordingly. So you end up with both worse compression and more CPU > usage.
Ah, I was not paying enough attention. I did not realize destination scanning was done for every byte.