Re: Gui criticism
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 5, 2009, 20:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vhbs5qhlf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <94a0d4530912051225y2d193a1fqfb38ebcce95719c3@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
> Also, the main action to do in this system should be "vote", that's > the action that should be fast.
Actually I do not think you would want that, especially as a moderator (I am assuming that you would be self-appointing to be one). What will you do to help a "broad, vague, and infeasible idea" forward when it gets many votes?
That is why I prefer a system that requires substance when voicing an opinion ("Yes I like the solution because in addition to the original problem description it will also help this use case"), and it also is the reason I tend to ignore e-mails that only say "+1" on this list.
In other words, this is not a democracy, and you do not necessarily want a democracy that is prone to populism.