Re: [PATCH v2] Add push --set-upstream
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 16, 2010, 01:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vhbqmn9c4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <be6fef0d1001151653o7ba2cf7et8875eaf4333fc15a@mail.gmail.com>
Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> writes:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> writes: >> >>> Quoting Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> >>> >>>> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> # Ok let's do it for real. >>>>> git push --track there this >>>> >>>> Ugh; s/--track/--set-upstream/, of course. >>> >>> How can I use this to say I want to use 'pull --rebase'? >> >> I dunno; "git push --set-upstream=rebase", perhaps? > > how about --setup-merge and --setup-rebase? > > After all, there's already the config called branch.autosetupmerge and > branch.autosetuprebase.
Do you mean Ilari's patch already sets up branch.name.rebase for people with branch.autosetuprebase true?
If so, it might be better to keep "--set-upstream" as is, and have a way to countermand that "autosetuprebase" default.