Re: [PATCH] git-am: indicate where a failed patch is to be found.
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 12, 2012, 17:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vhatcc1ql.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1342108243-8599-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> writes:
> If git am wasn't run with --reject, we assume the end user > knows where to find the patch. This is normally true for > a single patch,
Not at all. Whether it is a single or broken, the patch is fed to underlying "apply" from an unadvertised place.
> So, provide a helpful hint as to where they can > find the patch ...
This is OK, but you may want to give a way to squelch it once the user learns where it is by following the usual "advice.*" thing.
> ... to do the manual fixup before eventually > continuing with "git add ... ; git am -r".
This is _NOT_ fine, especially if you suggest "patch" the user may not have, and more importantly does not have a clue why "git apply" rejected it ("am" does _not_ use "patch" at all).