Re: merge noise in git-shortlog output
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Sep 6, 2005, 22:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vfyshg8ia.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <200509062144.j86Li04N010540@agluck-lia64.sc.intel.com>
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> writes:
> This is valid (I really did make all those commits, they happen every > time I merge the "linus" branch into my release branch, which I like to > do quite often so I'm working near the bleeding edge), but it doesn't > seem all that useful in the "short" log output[1]
Are there interesting merges and uninteresting automerges? Are all merges more or less uninteresting? If merges are not interesting:
$ git log --no-merges --pretty=short $rev $argu $ments | git shortlog