Re: git cherry-pick feature request
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Aug 23, 2006, 09:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vfyfnixv5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <17643.62896.396783.890223@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> writes:
> Could I have a flag to git cherry-pick (-q for quiet, maybe) that > tells it not to print anything if the command succeeds? Could I also > have a flag that tells it to clean up if the merge fails and leave the > tree in its previous state?
Quiet sounds sane.
Reverting to its "previous state" I am not quite sure if it is worth making it an option and run it as part of cherry-pick.