Re: Default "tar" umask..
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jan 5, 2007, 22:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vejq9drlx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <459ED17E.2080101@lsrfire.ath.cx>
René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> writes:
> [Junio: Sorry for resending, I somehow dropped the CC:'s the first time.]
I think that was my fault. I somehow dropped the CC:'s and resent without you to the list, and you responded to the first one.
> ... Err, unless the target system has a group named git, which > would then be used instead. Come to think of it, having this "git" > group name in there is a bit strange and unnecessary. How about the > following patch?
It is a very good point. I think this patch is sane, regardless of 002 vs 022 issue.