Re: reset: silent for some commands, verbose for others?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 22, 2011, 17:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vei1iyzw7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4E29A792.9020805@avtalion.name>
Ori Avtalion <ori@avtalion.name> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Looking at the reset's command third form: > > reset [--soft | --mixed | --hard | --merge | --keep] [-q] [<commit>] > > * --soft, --merge, --keep are silent. > * --mixed prints "Unstaged changes after reset: ..." > * --hard prints "HAED is now at..." > > If all of those commands move HEAD, shouldn't all of them print "HEAD is > now at..."? > > Why should only --mixed print the list of unstaged files? e.g. Isn't it > useful for --soft to give a list of "Staged changes"?
I would say not, as you would use "soft" only when you _know_ what you have in the index is what you want, and more importantly it does not change what is in the index, unlike "mixed" variant.