Re: [PATCH 2/6] Teach remote.c about the remote.default configuration setting.

>> Is it even a _side effect_?  Isn't this one of the primary points of
>> the series?  I do not think this patch makes sense if we did not
>> want that change to happen.
>> 
>> Or am I missing something?
>
> No, you're not -- I agree that this change in behaviour makes sense.  I
> simply hadn't anticipated this effect when I first did the work.
>
> So should the commit message simply say "This changes the default behavior of
> 'git push' ..."?  Or are you suggesting the message needn't mention it at all?