Re: Weird problem with git-submodule.sh
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 12, 2012, 19:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vehiv3vjm.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CABURp0oc_g3T3n0A4on=n8443sTFR6SKf1xcgN2EAFcx9eU_Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> writes: >> It's FreeBSD 7.2, which I know is an obsolete version but I'm not able to >> upgrade the machine. I believe FreeBSD's sh is, or is derived from, dash. > > Dash has been the default '/bin/sh' for Ubuntu for quite a long time > now[1] in spite of repeated reports of compatibility problems[2].
Wasn't the ancestry more like BSD ash (buggy) came before dash and Marc is running a BSD ash decendant that shared common ancestor with, not a decendant of, dash?
In any case, I do not think that is relevant; does does not seem to have this IFS bug.
> [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/141481
None of the ones listed seems to me a bug. Rather, I see it as a sign that the reporter does not know POSIX shell well and only learned his/her shell through bash.