Re: git applymbox is too anal
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Sep 9, 2005, 01:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vd5njrr0s.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050908233906.GA7976@kroah.com>
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> So, the patch shows that there was another line at the end of the file, > while in reality it isn't (this is due to me excluding a patch from the > series that I'm applying due to other reasons.) > > Is this something that git can handle without me editing the patch by > hand? :)
Linus was quite strict about rejecting any fuzz, but I am sympathetic to the cause. I do not mind if somebody comes up with a patch to add '--fuzz' option to git-apply; we can try applying first without --fuzz and ask the user if he wants one from 'git applymbox' main loop when it fails.