Re: [PATCH 1/3 v5] diff --stat: tests for long filenames and big change counts
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 16, 2012, 20:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vd39ezgwt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4F3CD318.1040600@in.waw.pl>
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On 02/15/2012 06:12 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek<zbyszek@in.waw.pl> writes: >> >>> Eleven tests for various combinations of a long filename and/or big >>> change count and ways to specify widths for diff --stat. >>> --- >> >> Sign-off? > >> Hrm, this does not seem to pass, making the result of applying [1/3] fail; >> I see that the elided name is shown much shorter than the above expects. > > Hi, > > I'm sorry for not properly testing the patch with tests. I somehow > convinced myself that the tests pass. This whole series needs more > work, even after squashing in your two patches.
It is nothing to be sorry about if a series needs more polishing; that is what the review discussions are for.
I've queued the series after restructuring it, and merged except for [3/3] to 'pu', which conflicts too heavily with the nd/diffstat-gramnum topic that is already in 'master'. I'd say we should concentrate on your first two patches without the "num-width" stuff and get them in first, and then later consider if rerolling the [3/3] patch is worth it after the dust settles.
Thanks.