Re: Multi-head pulling series
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Aug 23, 2005, 01:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vbr3p1mws.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <200508221835.31275.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I think that both, default and non-default persistant > mappings, are only a handy convenience issue for less > typing. If GIT core is not doing this, some (most?) porcelains > will invent their own way for storing these mappings (like > Cogito is doing with branches/). I think it is better if this > is "standardized".
I agree in principle, and it should not be hard to add support for optional "Default-pull" and "Default-push" keywords to remotes/ files (lack of which means to use LHS of refspecs on "Pull" or "Push" lines) to git-parse-remote-script. Patches welcome.
> Currently missing here is automatic detection of the remote > repository for a given head to be pulled/pushed. But this is > no format issue.
"git ls-remote <repo>" perhaps?