Re: Deleting remote branches with git-branch and reflog questions

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Jan 24, 2007, 01:46 UTC
Message-ID: <7vbqkpkxhk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701231649520.3011@xanadu.home>

Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:

Show 8 quoted lines

> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> And we might want to allow reflogs on detached HEAD someday,
>> although I personally think it goes against what detached HEAD
>> is -- it is of a very temporary nature.
>
> Didn't we agree already that reflog with detached head was simply 
> insane?

Perhaps, perhaps not.

	$ git checkout v2.6.14
        $ git checkout v2.6.15
        $ git checkout v2.6.16

Ah, which one did I check-out the last time?

	$ git describe HEAD@{1}

I suspect that we could re-implement "git bisect" without using the special "bisect" branch (we would still be using refs/bisect namespace).