git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: RFC: Making submodules "track" branches

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Jun 8, 2010, 23:09 UTC
Message-ID
<7vbpblruj8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To
<4C0E6A8A.70608@web.de>
Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> writes:
> Don't record a commit in the first place, following a branch is not bound
> to a special commit, so pretending to do that might do more harm than good.
> Just putting the 0-hash there might be the solution.

Ugh. Even though I understand that in some scenarios you would want to say "I don't care what commit is used for this submodule---just use the tip of the branch 'fred'", I don't think you want to use 0{40} in the superproject. I think it would be Ok to add such a note to .gitmodules in the superproject, but I also think we should still record which _exact_ commit was used to test and validate such a commit in the superproject when it was made.

If you clone a superproject that contains such a submodule from an upstream, keeping them up-to-date while working on your own change, it is perfectly fine to choose to use whatever random commit that happens to be at the tip of 'fred' branch in a submodule (and needless to say, that commit might be your own commit that nobody else has, if you have been actively working in that submodule, that you haven't published), that is different from what the person who created the commit in the superproject had. But at least you would need to be able to tell that the result of a build from such a state is different from what the superproject had. Recording 0{40} would make the information contained in the superproject tree meaningless.

Wouldn't it be enough to say --ignore-submodules for your day-to-day work, without lying in the gitlink entry in the superproject tree? An entry "submodule.foo.branch = fred" in your .gitmodules will still tell your local git to update the submodule worktree to work on 'fred' branch. At least, an arrangement like that would allow the build infrastructure to use --no-ignore-submodules when running its equivalent of GIT-VERSION-GEN to notice that what you are building is using something different from what the superproject specified to use in the submodule, while not bugging you with differences you do not care about (or you already know about and are irrelevant to the change you are working on).

Previous: Johan HerlandNext: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Message 14 of 21 in “RFC: Making submodules "track" branches”
  1. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonJun 7, 2010
  2. Johan HerlandJun 8, 2010
  3. Marc BranchaudJun 8, 2010
  4. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonJun 8, 2010
  5. Marc BranchaudJun 8, 2010
  6. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonJun 8, 2010
  7. Marc BranchaudJun 9, 2010
  8. Jens LehmannJun 8, 2010
  9. Johan HerlandJun 8, 2010
  10. Jens LehmannJun 9, 2010
  11. Johan HerlandJun 9, 2010
  12. Steven MichalskeJun 9, 2010
  13. Johan HerlandJun 9, 2010
  14. Junio C HamanoJun 8, 2010
  15. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonJun 8, 2010
  16. Jens LehmannJun 9, 2010
  17. Jens LehmannJun 9, 2010
  18. Marc BranchaudJun 9, 2010
  19. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonJun 9, 2010
  20. nottrobinNov 20, 2012
  21. W. Trevor KingNov 20, 2012

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.