Re: [PATCH] Don't optimize code in debug build
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 13, 2011, 19:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vbp2fybs7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <201102131036.51311.j6t@kdbg.org>
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:
Show 18 quoted lines
>> @@ -262,7 +262,10 @@ endif >> >> # CFLAGS and LDFLAGS are for the users to override from the command line. >> >> -CFLAGS = -g -O2 -Wall >> +CFLAGS = -g -Wall >> +ifndef DEBUG >> +CFLAGS += -O2 >> +endif >> LDFLAGS = >> ALL_CFLAGS = $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) >> ALL_LDFLAGS = $(LDFLAGS) > > Instead of this, you can just write > > CFLAGS = -g -Wall > > in your config.mak. Is anything wrong with that?
You then need to feed -O2 from the command line when you are not doing a debugging build. On the other hand, with the current Makefile, you need to feed "-g -O0" from the command line when you are doing a debugging build if you and your debugger get confused when seeing an optimized binary. So neither is a very good solution.
But having to feed DEBUG=Yes when running a debug build is not a good solution either. A single toggle is simply too coarse-grained; the next temptation after applying this patch would be to add
ifdef DEBUG
CFLAGS += -DDEBUG
endifand from there everything goes downhill. That is the last thing we would want to see happen.
So I would say the current Makefile is just fine as is.