Re: Should cg-mkpatch output be usable with cg-patch?
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jul 21, 2005, 03:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vackgerpe.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050720234904.B3ED735267C@atlas.denx.de>
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> writes:
> I wander what I should do with "cg-mkpatch" generated output; I had > the impression that this should be usable with "cg-patch", but these > are incompatible with each other. Forexample. if a commit contains > permission changes, my generated patch may look like this:
Yes, cg-patch does grok git extended diff headers, but does it by hand and missing corner cases like this is understandable.
I only briefly looked at cg-patch, but I suspect that it can lose 90% lines of its code by just using "git-apply --index".
I see cg-patch wants to be able to do reverse patch, which is not supported by git-apply currently.
Do people find "cg-patch -R" useful?