Re: [PATCH] Improve and fix git-check-attr(1)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 14, 2008, 23:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vabd6686n.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20081013175705.GA9538@diku.dk>
Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Always use 'verse' for multi-line synopsis sections. Add output and > example sections to document what output can be expected. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> > > --- > Documentation/git-check-attr.txt | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > At least the first chunk should be applied. The last is a quick attempt > at documenting the expected output formally and with examples. > ... > tg: (340fcf4..) jf/man-git-check-attr (depends on: next)
Should this really have to depend on next? I have a feeling that a large part of this (sans --stdin/-z) is a 'maint' material.
Could you split this into two patches, one for 'maint' to describe the output format, and another for 'next' (or 'dp/checkattr') to update the SYNOPSIS part?