Re: [PATCH] mergetool--lib: add diffmerge as a pre-configured mergetool option
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 10, 2009, 00:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vaaxrn10o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1260302477-49412-1-git-send-email-jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> diff --git a/git-mergetool--lib.sh b/git-mergetool--lib.sh
> index 5b62785..5b29fef 100644
> --- a/git-mergetool--lib.sh
> +++ b/git-mergetool--lib.sh
> @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ check_unchanged () {
> valid_tool () {
> case "$1" in
> kdiff3 | tkdiff | xxdiff | meld | opendiff | \
> - emerge | vimdiff | gvimdiff | ecmerge | diffuse | araxis | p4merge)
> + emerge | vimdiff | gvimdiff | ecmerge | diffuse | araxis | p4merge | \
> + diffmerge)
> ;; # happy
> tortoisemerge)
> if ! merge_mode; thenAs we are in pre-release feature freeze, it doesn't matter very much if I take this patch now, so I'll let it sit in the list archive for now.
But I have to wonder about the maintainability of this file, if we have to add every time somebody finds yet another diff/merge backends that could be used, even a closed-source one.
There are only a handful of entry points that mergetool--lib defines, and by overriding what should happen when these entry points are called, an end user should be able to tell mergetool/difftool to use a new backend.
Perhaps it is a better approach to first eject bulk of code for the backends we currently support under these case statements into separate files, one per backend, move them to mergetool/ subdirectory in the source tree, install them as "$(share)/git-core/mergetool/$toolname", and at runtime source them? That way, a patch to add a new backend can be as simple as adding a new file in mergetool/ and doing nothing else. Also an end user can privately add support to a new backend much more easily.
Anybody want to try that approach?