Re: Should "git help" respect the 'pager' setting?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 2, 2013, 22:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7va9n8m9rq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130530171431.GF17475@serenity.lan>
John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:38:59PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: >> Matthieu Moy wrote: >> > I find it a bit weird that Git sets the configuration for external >> > commands, but it may make sense. No strong opinion here. >> >> I don't mean a setenv() kind of thing: how would we unset it after >> that? Perhaps something like execvpe(), passing in the environment as >> an argument?
Running "man" is the last thing we do before exitting "git help" and exec_man_man() does seem to do execlp(), so I do not see it as an issue.
> Overriding PAGER might make sense, but I'd be quite annoyed if Git > decided to override MANPAGER without providing some way to override it.
Hmm, see below.
> If a user sets MANPAGER then it's because they want a specific pager > when reading man pages - invoking man through "git help" shouldn't cause > it to behave differently in this case.
True, and for that matter, if the user sets PAGER to use with non-Git (including manual pages) and also sets GIT_PAGER to use specifically with Git, the user would be annoyed if we passed formatted manual pages to GIT_PAGER by exporting PAGER (or driving "man" with its "-P" option).